Best Answer etcio† , 07 August 2013 - 09:05 PM
Seems to appear the same on Chrome/Safari/Firefox. I've tried it on another computer with a different screen size and it seems to appear the same. Here's the original image: http://dreamerphotos...achment_id=2161. I want to make it so that more of the image is visible if that's possible.
Ahh - I understand what you're doing now.
The system is, in fact, resizing it to maximize the amount of visible photo. The distance is being calculated based on an assumption that you'll be scrolling past the section and content will exist underneath the DC section. So effectively, the bottom pixel of the photo will hit the bottom of the DC section when it hits the top of your screen. Does that make sense?
Right now, you don't have any content underneath it so you don't see the full distance it is made to scroll. I have planned on making it a tad smarter in the future, where it tries to calculate the distance of content underneath the section instead of assuming you'll want to scroll the full distance of the screen.
I'll add another tally to my feature request list for smarter distance sizing.
Does all of that make sense?Go to the full post